|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Troy Cefaratti writes:
> The way I read the article it didn't seem that they were so much upset that
> he had come up with the new OS, but rather that he had named it legOS.
>
> No matter how you look at it, or what excuse he can come up for choosing
> that name, it is pushing the envelope a bit. I personnally wouldn't blame
> Lego if they were forced to sue him to change it. Hopefully he will do the
> inteligent thing and change it before it gets to that point.
I concur. If I manufactured a new extra-cushiony disk storage system that
used *really* tiny sponges for support, and I called it Micro-Soft, I'm sure
I'd get a letter. This particular case has the added spin of stepping
soundly into the "LEGO bricks/not LEGOS" debate. If TLG is serious about
protecting its intellectual property, and if they perceive LegOS (a clever
name, undeniably!) to be a danger to that property, then they are well
within their rights to contest it.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|