To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 25753
25752  |  25754
Subject: 
Re: Digital Camera
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 20:10:41 GMT
Viewed: 
3158 times
  
In lugnet.general, Mike Faunce writes:
> Guys,
> 
> Not that you aren't giving good advice, but remember this guys
> application -- posting pics of items to Ebay.  He doesn't need Megapixels,
> 640x480 would work just fine.

To be perfectly honest I had no intention of responding just to the original
poster's message - otherwise I would have replied to it and not to two
messages written after it.

That's how threaded conversations work - they start at one point then branch
out.  The ends of the various branches may bear no resemblance to the
original post, nor should they be expected to.

> When uploading to the web (especially Ebay) size matters (both KB and
> pixels) so spending the money to buy a 3 or 4 megapixel camera and then
> taking shots at it's lowest resolution doesn't make much sense.

Actually I think there's a reasonable argument for having the larger (and
probably higher quality) CCD but I'm not a digicam technobuff - I just
bought the one I liked best and that had the features I wanted, including
image size, quality, and storage capacity.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Digital Camera
 
Guys, Not that you aren't giving good advice, but remember this guys application -- posting pics of items to Ebay. He doesn't need Megapixels, 640x480 would work just fine. I'd look for a cheap 640x480 or 800x600 camera with a flash and a USB (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

28 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR