Subject:
|
Re: Clones & Tente
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 21:41:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1629 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry wrote:
> > Tente fails One utterly. 0% Fails Two utterly as well. Only in Three is
> > there any congruence, and even there, much of Tente is to a much smaller
> > scale. Certainly all ships. Only the trucks are similar to Minifig
> > scale, but even then, they are closer to realistic scale (a truck seats
> > 3 people across, but the people are much smaller than one minifig.
> > Implied, not certain, because no figs are supplied.) So I'd even score
> > it 0% there.
I've got some TENTE space figures to go with figure scale spaceships -
the same size as LEGO ones.
Steve Bliss wrote:
> But Tente could be considered a clone, because it is based on a
> top-stud-joining-brick-bottom system. But it's 0% compatible.
> As opposed to K'nex, which is 0% clone, 100% competitor.
> Steve
I think the top-stud-joining-brick-bottom should be the rule appiled to
any such 'Clone' newsgroup to prevent the any-toys problem.
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clones & Tente
|
| (...) But Tente could be considered a clone, because it is based on a top-stud-joining-brick-bottom system. But it's 0% compatible. As opposed to K'nex, which is 0% clone, 100% competitor. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
