Subject:
|
Re: Clones & Tente
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:10:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1422 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 11:39:22 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> Tente fails One utterly. 0% Fails Two utterly as well. Only in Three is
> there any congruence, and even there, much of Tente is to a much smaller
> scale. Certainly all ships. Only the trucks are similar to Minifig
> scale, but even then, they are closer to realistic scale (a truck seats
> 3 people across, but the people are much smaller than one minifig.
> Implied, not certain, because no figs are supplied.) So I'd even score
> it 0% there.
But Tente could be considered a clone, because it is based on a
top-stud-joining-brick-bottom system. But it's 0% compatible.
As opposed to K'nex, which is 0% clone, 100% competitor.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clones & Tente
|
| (...) I've got some TENTE space figures to go with figure scale spaceships - the same size as LEGO ones. Steve Bliss wrote: (...) I think the top-stud-joining-brick-bottom should be the rule appiled to any such 'Clone' newsgroup to prevent the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Clones & Tente
|
| removed admin.general on this followup, it's not admin.. (...) More than one dimension here. One is, how compatible is it. (do studs and plugs mate? How many different kinds of mates? just the basic stud, or does rod system mate as well, how about (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
