Subject:
|
Re: TLG == Lego ? "Yes" : "No"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:06:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1134 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 04:40:52 GMT, "Janet Zorn" <lighthouse@bonzai.net>
wrote:
> Funny, but that is sort of what a "shell" (little s) corporation does.
Right, the Shell companies are shell companies.
> Maybe they've really taken the name to heart.
The inactives seem to be ventures that didn't pan out, but Shell doesn't
want to totally dissolve the incorporation. Maybe they'll think they
can use them later.
Maybe it's the corporate equivalent to a lawyer saying "we won't pursue
this matter for now." Never totally close the door to anything.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: TLG == Lego ? "Yes" : "No"
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36b5c090.6570725@lu...et.com>... :On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 19:30:09 GMT, lehman@javanet.com (Todd Lehman) :wrote: : :>p.s. I think Shell is also officially the Shell Group of companies. : :Spend some time at the Shell (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
