To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2078
2077  |  2079
Subject: 
Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:13:22 GMT
Viewed: 
1216 times
  
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999 04:34:26 GMT, "Janet Zorn" <lighthouse@bonzai.net>
wrote:
Right. I'd really like to make some slightly taller minifigs. You can
make giants by putting in 1x2s, but the minifig studs are too big to
add a plate which would be a more normal variation.

The original minifigs, which had just slightly altered 1*2*1 2/3
bricks as legs and body (with arms legs molded in, not movable, no
hands) had regulars studs. I believe they only produced thos for a
couple of years, before switching to the current style of minifigs.
They probably ran tests and decided that regular studs didn't wortk
well enough :)

Jasper



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
 
Tim McSweeney wrote in message ... :Why do MiniFig legs have such long studs on top to attatch them to bodies? :What's wrong with Normal Studs? sure they'd be a bit weaker but it works OK :for the witch minifig. :Why break the standard in this one (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)

36 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR