To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2035
2034  |  2036
Subject: 
Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 23:39:25 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@geocitiesIHATESPAM.com
Viewed: 
1394 times
  
Tom McDonald wrote:
Jim Baker writes:
Incidently, the modern direction of Lego, with ever more action-oriented
sets, underscores a crucial failing: minifigs suck as action figures.
They are far better as symbolic placeholders than as dolls, which is
what real action figures really are.
*wrbrldrbl*wrbrldrbl*wrbrldrbl* (head shaking sound fx)
That was a bit of a wet slap, albeit, IMO, a correct one. Don't forget to
nicely .dear-lego your point Jim. Maybe that'll wake a few TLG folks up!

I'm not so sure we want Lego action figures.  Chances are, if they give
up on minifigs, they'd use some other existing doll for the action
figures -- and the choices are Scala and Belleville.

In other words, *oowhuwhuwhuwhuwhuhuhu* (body shuddering sound fx :-)

Cheers,
- Sproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat - jsproat@geocities.com
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
 
(...) The Technic Figs aren't too bad, apart from the fact that they aren't modular. Wish List: Modular Technic Figs so I can swap leg secions, Arm Section, Heads, Hair.... Some Female Technic Figs. The guys are getting lonely.(1) Cheers Tim (1) (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
 
(...) I appreciate it when other do what I call "bodymonopoeia" :) I guess I should have been clearer: I don't think TLG is ready to retire minifigs so I thought such a message might get them back on the minifig track. But speaking of track, if (...) (26 years ago, 15-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
 
(...) *wrbrldrbl*wrbrldrbl*wrbrldrbl* (head shaking sound fx) That was a bit of a wet slap, albeit, IMO, a correct one. Don't forget to nicely .dear-lego your point Jim. Maybe that'll wake a few TLG folks up! -Tom McD. (that was too close to an (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)

36 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR