Subject:
|
Re: Damaged MINT Lego?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 May 2000 17:55:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
719 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote:
> Yet another type of 'damage' is greasy rubber stains. Of course that probably
> only bothers me because of my no-grease-on-bricks OCD.
I have found this very annoying of late. The grease can be quite noticable
and is hard to remove, and a few small tires can "contaminate" a large
polybag full of parts.
In reponse to the original aim of the thread, I've found one 1x2 brick that
was about 3/4 there, circa 1997. I can't think of any other mis-molded
elements I've seen in the last 25 years.
Steve
--
Barb & Steve Demlow | demlow@visi.com | www.visi.com/~demlow/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Damaged MINT Lego?
|
| Steve Demlow <demlow@visi.com> wrote in message news:Ftw754.A3y@lugnet.com... (...) probably (...) noticable (...) Hmm. I have never noticed this - is it obvious? Perhaps it only effects US/North American production? Scott A (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Damaged MINT Lego?
|
| (...) recognition, obviously a manufacturing mistake. Another type of 'mint' damage is scratching. I opened a new 1789 Star Hawk II with many of the pieces badly scratched, as if from extremely rough handling. The box however had absolutely no (...) (24 years ago, 30-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
