Subject:
|
Re: Scans of 1960's ads
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:04:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.ORGantispam
|
Viewed:
|
800 times
|
| |
|
|
Nick Goetz <ngoetz@iquest.net> wrote:
> Neat. It is interesting to note that the builders/designers of the time (if
> there were any at tht time) did not even attempt to curve the legs or top of
> that elephant. Even the tusks are composed of several rectangles instead of
> a consistant curve. How far they have come.
That's partly a stylistic thing -- take a look at buildings designed in that
era.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Scans of 1960's ads
|
| True the building were more "blocky" but an elephant? I guess in a time when human faces were nothing more than a 2x2 block, the elephants were thankful they even got tusks! <g> -Nick Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Scans of 1960's ads
|
| Neat. It is interesting to note that the builders/designers of the time (if there were any at tht time) did not even attempt to curve the legs or top of that elephant. Even the tusks are composed of several rectangles instead of a consistant curve. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
