Subject:
|
Re: Attention Lego Group: Children don't like juniorization, either!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:27:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
762 times
|
| |
|
|
Colin R Gutierrez wrote:
> "cheap toy aisle" at the store. Third, it hurts my brain to have such
> an unrealistic vehicle represented as real 20th century technology. I
> can accept wild looking futuristic vehicles if they are from
> science-FICTION, but Space Port is supposed to be based on real space
> exploration. The wing is too small for shuttle-style re-entry, there
> are no boosters or fuel tanks, and it's got several corners and parts
> sticking out, which is _not_ aerodynamic. I just have problems
> suspending my disbelief.
Well, NASA does have some concept space planes which are more or less wingless,
"SRB-less", and with no external fuel tank. The major one looks like a flying
triangular wing.
But you're right, the aerodyanmic corners thing really screws things up.
Chet
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
