 | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) The voting facility is a suggestion facility. 9 times out of 10, what gets the most votes is what gets used as that week's pick. Sometimes there are exceptions, like when Bram's LDraw & LEdit tutorial went up as the weekly pick last year (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | | (...) there (...) I don't understand a word of that you just described above. For example there are sites A, B, C and D that people can vote on with radio buttons next to them. By the end of the week, Joe builds this very cool castle and 20 people (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) This may be clearer: (URL) [snip description of enhanced voting mechanism] A better voting mechanism will be feasable later when voting is more secure (via member sign-in, and after there are at least ~500 members or so), but for now it's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | | | (...) I see. Right now a person can submit multiple votes from a single IP. A not very effective solution would be to place a cookie on the client's PC after which they voted once for a specific week they couldn't vote again. This would eliminate (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Huw Millington
|
| | | | | | D. Jezek <danjezek@REMOVEaloha.net> wrote in message news:Fn0J0G.MvJ@lugnet.com... (...) wasn't (...) one (...) the (...) Thanks Dan. Not the most complete, but its quality over quantity. I think I know what stuffing is, and needless to say, I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | (...) Another problem with the cookie solution is that some people don't accept cookies. (...) Todd, will you allow people to vote for more than one site in the future? I sometimes do, but I've never tryed to stuff the ballot. (If you will, then the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I think people should be able to give fractional votes: You get 1.0 "voting points" to spread out however you want among the sites. You might give 30% to one and 70% to another, for example. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Fred Carcanague
|
| | | | | | Out of curiosity... What are the standards to be nominated for CLSOTW? My site has been online since just after tax time 99' w/decient traffic. Both on the original Geocities site and the more currently updated webjump site. Close to 2700 visitors (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | | | | (...) It's when people see it for the first time and are like "Holy s...." or "Hey!!! That's pretty cool". It also happens when people take one look at your site and become speechless for a short period of time, their jaws drop to the floor and they (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Anyone can nominate any site for any reason, even their own site. Where it ends up in the queue is somewhat subjective, based on a number of factors, and also somewhat objective, based on the quantity or frequency of nominations. When a newly (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Troy Cefaratti
|
| | | | | | | | (...) voting (...) Does this include directory names as well? I have a simplenet account, and in an effort to keep my Lego stuff seperate from other stuff on the site, it is all in the troy.simplenet.com/lego/ directory. Would this prevent me from (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dave Astolfo
|
| | | | | | Funny, I found the same for my site. Last yr from Sept98 till July99 my site drew over 10000 unique hits. I have updated my counter, and since July 99, I have rec'd 2900 hits - but yet I have not received any CLSOTW nominations. I kinda thought my (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) I think what Todd is trying to say is that if a site is especially noteworthy, he'll pick it over the other sites in the list. For the Halloween and Star Wars contests, it made sense to pick those sites for the respective weeks because the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | | (...) This defeats the whole purpose of voting then. I wonder how much worth a vote has if Todd is ultimately going to select the site he wants. (...) Yes of course! I think about this every time I post in here. (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | (...) Of course it doesn't. (...) You weren't listening. Go back and read what I wrote again. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think the point is that the sites are picked by Todd. The vote is there as a sort of aid. It's not an election. (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Like I said, though, 9 times out of 10 (about) it is. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | CLSOTW "voting" (was Re: CLSOTW voting —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Our input is important but it's not merely a popularity contest. A lot of stuff around here works that way... For instance, Spotlight: (URL) for one like it that way. I'd rather trust the judgement of someone whose aesthetics and sense of what (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: CLSOTW "voting" (was Re: CLSOTW voting —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | | On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Larry Pieniazek (<385DBE8B.AEE31E15@...ager.net>) wrote at 05:28:43 (...) Rock on. Democracies are usually run by minorities, anyway. And we all know how well committees work :-) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) The queue is pretty long. There are actually so many totally outstanding sites that the non-totally-outstanding sites don't stand a chance. But that's kind of the whole point -- the showcase the most outstanding stuff. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
