To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 10931
10930  |  10932
Subject: 
Re: Lego In Chu?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
Date: 
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:12:13 GMT
Viewed: 
745 times
  
In lugnet.general, Tamyra Teed writes:

I saw the "Royal King" set when I was in Manitoba last christmas in the
dollar store, The box made the set look pretty good, though I happened
to find an open one on the shelf and the horse looked like Sh*t. I
almost picked it up though decided against it.  I don't remember the box
having the Shifty on it, just the red box with some chinese? lettering.
I'll have to check if I go up for New Years to see if they are still
there.

Heh, I call these sets "Shitfy" without the "F"!  But seriously, the quality
is REALLY bad.  These bricks make MegaBlocks look good.  The instructions are
like colour photocopies.  The color is way off, and the printing on the
minifigs (I can't bear to use this word for Sh*ty) is horrible.

Bryan



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego In Chu?
 
(...) I saw the "Royal King" set when I was in Manitoba last christmas in the dollar store, The box made the set look pretty good, though I happened to find an open one on the shelf and the horse looked like Sh*t. I almost picked it up though (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)

15 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR