Subject:
|
Re: Lego In Chu?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 07:38:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
691 times
|
| |
| |
If you saw it in real life, you wouldn't want it. It looks really bad next
to real Lego.
--
Paul Davidson, aka Tinman
http://theForce.net
"If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful
than you can possibly imagine."
Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote in message news:FLy28D.67@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, Scott W. Runyan writes:
> > Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote in message
> > news:FLx7IC.Koz@lugnet.com...
> > > Do you have a scanner? I think the LEGO community would be interested in
> > > seeing this -- clones are always of interest, and a direct rip-off like
> > > that would be, too. If you put pictures of the sets up on the web, they
> > > could be forwarded to LEGO.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
> >
> > Right here, thanks to Chris Doyle
> >
> > http://www.bootlegtoys.com/legos/shifty.htm
> >
> > Lego is not a toy, it's a way of life. Build on!
> > ScottR swrunyan@uswest.net
>
> Ack! What a surprise to see the old red soldier figure.
> I hate to say this, but if I found a store stocking this
> stuff, I'd buy multiple copies of that set (if the quality
> wasn't tooo heinous) just for that figure. (Then I'd
> hate myself for doing so, and probably keep the rip-off
> figures bagged in a ziplock separately from the rest of
> my soldiers.)
>
> --
>
> jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lego In Chu?
|
| (...) Ack! What a surprise to see the old red soldier figure. I hate to say this, but if I found a store stocking this stuff, I'd buy multiple copies of that set (if the quality wasn't tooo heinous) just for that figure. (Then I'd hate myself for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|