Subject:
|
Re: Lego In Chu?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 15:50:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
673 times
|
| |
|
|
Nephilim wrote [re: Shifty]:
> Ack! What a surprise to see the old red soldier figure.
> I hate to say this, but if I found a store stocking this
> stuff, I'd buy multiple copies of that set (if the quality
> wasn't tooo heinous) just for that figure. (Then I'd
> hate myself for doing so, and probably keep the rip-off
> figures bagged in a ziplock separately from the rest of
> my soldiers.)
If, that is, the soldiers inside were really red.
Didn't this thread come up before regarding SHIFTY? That what was in the box
didn't even come close to matching what was on the box (the image being, as it
is, a direct ripoff of the LEGO box)?
best
Lindsay
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego In Chu?
|
| (...) Ack! What a surprise to see the old red soldier figure. I hate to say this, but if I found a store stocking this stuff, I'd buy multiple copies of that set (if the quality wasn't tooo heinous) just for that figure. (Then I'd hate myself for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
