Subject:
|
Re: Thank God for Lugnet
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Dec 1998 00:47:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3066 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Sep 1998 17:40:02 GMT, sarah@eskimo.com (Perhaps a
Princess....) wrote:
>
> That's nothing. 243 messages really aren't that many when you are
> talking about a UseNET group these days.
Well, In any froup _I_'ve participasted in, over 100 (non-spam) msgs
means high-volume...
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Thank God for Lugnet
|
| (...) What is a froup? You have used that term a number of times now and I have no idea what it means, except in context, as some sort of cute back formation from newsgroup and something else, meaning just "newsgroup". The Jargon File (1) is silent (...) (26 years ago, 4-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Thank God for Lugnet
|
| (...) That's nothing. 243 messages really aren't that many when you are talking about a UseNET group these days. (...) It'll stick around forever and ever. But maybe it will have less traffic on it as people move to Lugnet. Or maybe now we will have (...) (26 years ago, 29-Sep-98, to lugnet.general)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
