 | | Re: Batman fig in background of Sept/Oct lego club mag
|
|
(...) Well, Batman is a DC character, so a LEGO/Marvel license wouldn't give them any rights to Batman or Superman et al. However, Minimates does have both a DC and Marvel license (among many others). Is it possible that the figure you saw wasn't (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Batman fig in background of Sept/Oct lego club mag
|
|
Hi all, Not sure if this is old news (I've been away a while) but when I got a hold of the sept/oct lego club magazine I noticed in the backgroun amongst the Hockey fans on pg3 the lower half (torso and down) of a batman figure, All the other figs (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | looking to trade Duplo LEGO store bricks
|
|
I have several of the 2004 California Valley Fair/Hillsdale store bricks and I would like to trade them brick-for-brick for one or two the following store bricks: Lego Store Bluewater 2004 Lego Store Kingston 2003 Lego Store Koln 2002 Lego Store (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.promo, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) This has actually been happening on FBTB.net (Ask LEGO Forum) for several years. And yes, the questions have dwindled over time. Jake --- Jake McKee Community Liaison LEGO Community Development (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Hi, I really like this idea, it's very similar to what I was thinking. Perhaps something like 2 weeks to submit questions, a few days for an admin to edit and mash together similar questions, and then 2 weeks to vote on your favorites. Then, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Hi Jake! I believe a chat has a strong appeal due to it's interactive nature, and people like to be able to have a conversation with somebody in a position like yours. However, while reading the posts in this thread and reflecting on the chat, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Agree. Save the spontaneous discussion for one on one bull sessions where no one is scribing so your words can't get twisted around... (1) This moves you more in the direction of a PR flack, which is not much fun, so do the scripted questions (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: snip (...) This is definitely a problem with chats. more snipping (...) I do not think that pre-submitted questions would alter discussions of chat questions very much. Some people will be happy with answers you (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) snip (...) Submitting questions in advance would be fine with me - I'd rather have the best information than the quickest information. Perhaps a monthly poll could be held to determine the questions most in need of answering. I'd like to see a (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Not to make a bigger issue of this comment than was meant, but I am going to step in here quickly. Please remember that I'm but one person. I do my level-headed best to get and distribute as much information about "everything LEGO" as I (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) I read it as regular yellow, not the light yellow. Light yellow could have been one of the pastel colors that was modified. I'll check on this. (...) OK, to clarify: What I'm saying is not that our quality control has gone out the window. The (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) On the flip side, I was very excited to see the 'outreach' that these types of sessions offer--how many companies do you know that allow a 'one-on-one' with a representative, free of charge? Especially one that we have a personal vested (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Another "unofficial" response: I think we can all make the general inference that the sets were at once ordered and structured. Lego itself is too disorganized, it doesn't know its right hand from its left, therefore, you have a disorganized (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) This is not an "official" response, but I think that Jake was trying to say that the Yellow and Purple and some other non new colors had some quality control issues. I would also like to point out that these issues could be pointed to using (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) I don't know why I bother to read these sessions. I am usually left feeling worse about TLC than I would have had I not bothered. One exchange, in particular bugged me this time: [architect] ok, next to Jojo then [Jojo] Who is in charge for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | O-zone video
|
|
At least here is O-zone ((URL) ) a hit with Dragostea tin dei - someone appearently made that video with minifigs! See it here: (URL) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New (Old) Town Plan sets discovered.
|
|
(...) ...SNIP... Hi Gary, very nice new infos :-) But I was a little confused on the picture of the town plan board: (...) By comparing it with the 60th town plan board in the early 60th catalogues (set no. 200) it seems to have a different (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | New (Old) Town Plan sets discovered.
|
|
Eric Strand, who is helping me with the Lego CD (he's becoming a Samsonite expert) recently discovered some heretofore unknown Town Plan sets from the 1960's. The king of all 1960's sets was the Town Plan set with Town Plan board. In the USA/Canada (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale
|
|
(...) Well as the dimensions of a minifig are nowhere near proportional to a human, it's difficult to get an exact scale. I've seen scales ranging from 1:40 to 1:60 look ok with them, I think most people tend to scale in the low 40s if they're (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scale
|
|
(...) Minifigs have an exaggerated scale compared to the avergage human. However, the generally accepted 'standard' for minifig scale is usually stated as 1 stud= 1 foot, or 1:38.1. Personally, I think guaging a scale of the figure is a mistake in (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
