Subject:
|
Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:26:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1542 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
Sometimes I honestly wonder if doing chats and Q&As like this actually
creates more problems than solutions. Perhaps these types of sessions should
only be done with pre-submitted questions so I can find out the full, final
answers before speaking out of turn about them.
Thoughts?
Jake
|
Hi Jake!
I believe a chat has a strong appeal due to it’s interactive nature, and people
like to be able to have a conversation with somebody in a position like yours.
However, while reading the posts in this thread and reflecting on the chat, I
was thinking the best question that could have possibly been asked would be,
“Jake, could you ask around and get us official answers to the questions you
were not sure about in the chat?”
So, yes, I believe pre-submitted questions certainly have their merit. In fact,
I think it would be great if the community could somehow compile a list
containing N number of questions, submit it to you, and get answers after a few
weeks or however long it takes.
That doesn’t mean I think you should not also chat sometimes, but you probably
need to put more emphasis on the “I don’t know, this is an unofficial response”
bit. Maybe somebody can create a clever acronym for that.
I’m done talking now, bye!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
| (...) Not to make a bigger issue of this comment than was meant, but I am going to step in here quickly. Please remember that I'm but one person. I do my level-headed best to get and distribute as much information about "everything LEGO" as I (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
