Subject:
|
Re: I'll volunteer for the LEGO FAQ
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Apr 1999 10:22:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1928 times
|
| |
|
|
Sproaticus (jsproat@geocities.com) wrote:
> Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> > Todd Lehman (lehman@javanet.com) wrote:
> > > For example, maybe one file for each question, formatted like so:
> > >
> > > Newsgroups: [list of newsgroups (wildcards permitted)
> > > that this question and its answer would appear in]
> > > Subject: [this is the question]
> > > Category: [named section; further modifies section
> > > implied by newsgroup]
>
> Also:
> Subcategory: [subcategory depth 1]
> Subcategory: [subcategory depth 2]
> etc.
I don't think so. We should rather choose a separator for
category levels:
Category: [category] / [subcategory depth 1] / ...
> Plus, some kind of tags at the beginning and ending of each FAQ entry would
> make parsing it much easier IMO.
Makes sense.
> I'm kind of split on whether to use HTML within the text. The plus = better
> formatting on a Web page. The minus = worse formatting when converted into
> plain text. Will this be an HTML-only FAQ?
Lets use HTML. We can always use "lynx -dump" to generate
plain text from the HTML edition. It is much harder to go
the other way.
Play well,
Jacob
------------------------------------------------------------
-- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk --
-- Web...: <URL:http://hugin.risoe.dk/JJ_Memorial/FAQ/> --
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I'll volunteer for the LEGO FAQ
|
| (...) Tags at the beginning and end of the file? That just makes processing more difficult, not easier. More syntax = more work. Less syntax = less work. I'm looking for a model with a simple but flexible design -- where individual collections Q&A (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: I'll volunteer for the LEGO FAQ
|
| (...) Also: Subcategory: [subcategory depth 1] Subcategory: [subcategory depth 2] etc. Plus, some kind of tags at the beginning and ending of each FAQ entry would make parsing it much easier IMO. e.g. (1): <FAQENTRY> Newsgroups: lugnet.market.* (...) (26 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
