Subject:
|
Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 May 2000 19:24:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
339 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:Fu007I.37x@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > I missed this - and only just found it by chance :
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=6483
>
> Curious -- Scott, you cancelled your original message (the one I replied • to)
> shortly after I posted my reply...?
No mystery - I did not like the tone of it. I thought there may have started
some sort of angry debate - so to be on the safe side I scrubbed it.
>
>
> > I think you may need to update the Homepage - either by removing the
> > misleading text, or by clarifying the matter. I think the latter would • me
> > more appropriate.
>
> I don't see any misleading text there (LEGO still does not officially • support
> or endorse LUGNET), but it can't hurt to add some sort of modifying • statement
> after the legal disclaimer (perhaps a link to more details) that LEGO • Direct
> has made a gratuitous financial gift (gratuitous in the legal sense).
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
