Subject:
|
Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 May 2000 19:16:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
424 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > I think you may need to update the Homepage - either by removing the
> > misleading text, or by clarifying the matter. I think the latter would me
> > more appropriate.
>
> Scott,
>
> Why do you think this necessary? From what I read of Todd's letter to Brad
> it seems to me the gift was accepted graciously but with the knowledge that
> it did not constitute sponsorship or any control over LUGNET itself.
That's absolutely correct, Eric.
In addition, the amount of the donation ($5,000 USD) is so tiny that it could
not even remotely be thought of as sponsorship or financial support unless
LEGO sends these sorts of things often and regularly, which I certainly
wouldn't count on without some sort of binding agreement.
--Todd
> If thats the case then I am OK with it and I think the disclaimer on the
> Homepage is still OK.
>
> If however LEGO were to make any donations with the understanding that Todd
> run LUGNET in any certain way then I would have a problem but at least in my
> view that has not happened yet.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
