Subject:
|
Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 May 2000 07:23:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
493 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> It's ugly and wordy and icky on a homepage, but this hopefully is enough info
> for people to make their own decisions as well as continuing to act as a legal
> disclaimer and preventing the possibility being accidentally misleading if
> someone makes assumptions about what sponsorship or endorsement means.
Why can't you just have:
Welcome to the international fan-created LEGO® Users Group Network! This is a
place for LEGO® fans of all ages to find information, meet one another, and
share ideas. For a list of benifactors see www.blah
At www.blah you could then be as wordy as you like about the situation.
Or do you think that'd make you guilty by omission?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
19 Messages in This Thread: ![neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Scott Arthur (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Scott Arthur (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Eric Kingsley (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Scott Arthur (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Matthew Miller (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Matthew Miller (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![(Cancelled)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Eric Kingsley (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Kevin Loch (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Scott Arthur (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Scott Arthur (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology) -Todd Lehman (3-May-00 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|