To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.db.invOpen lugnet.db.inv in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Database / Set Inventories / 790
789  |  791
Subject: 
Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.db.inv
Date: 
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:25:27 GMT
Viewed: 
630 times
  
In lugnet.db.inv, Kevin Salm wrote:

NO.  Not at all.

OK, good.  That was my main concern.

Now, having said  that, here are some that come to mind:
30359 --move to BAR
30035 --move to MINIFIG
2516 --move to MINIFIG
3959 --move to MINIFIG
4360 --move to MINIFIG
4596 --move to WINGS
--move all radar dish to own category

OK, good.  I agree with most of these, at least sort of. :)

BUT, don't do these things just 'cause I say so.  Who the heck am I to dictate
to you??  I love partsref and have great respect to all who take the time and
effort to keep it up-to-date only because they want to without fame or fortune.

I wouldn't change something because just one person says so.  Even
(especially) if that one person is me.  There are a few people who I bounce
ideas off of before actually doing them.

Organizationally speaking, we all have some ideas that are unique to our own
way of thinking.  For example: at my house, we have a 'gizmos' drawer for
odd lego pieces - like bricks with side studs, hinges, plates with clips,
etc.  I haven't run into anyone else who thinks ldraw/partsref needs a
'gizmos' category.

As for Peeron.com image library--I would like to see SOME categorization of
images but would not favor fragmentation similar to partsref.
Unnecessary, IMO -- until, perhaps, the time comes that there are lDraw
renderings and photographic images of 99% of all Lego elements.  That is
unlikely due to the (fast) pace in which The Lego Company produces new
elements.

Hmm.  99% would be too long to wait, I think.  But it might be more
practical to target a certain number of pieces/images per page.  700 is a
lot.  Maybe 100-200 would be better?  That's still about 500K per page.

....my opinions don't count, so I will go back to building now....

Hey!  Everyone's opinions count.  I'm dead serious about that.  There're a
lot of subjective decisions in parts organization, where opinion/intuition
is the major decision influencer.  Why would anyone else's opinion matter
more than yours?

But don't let me stop you from building....

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
 
(...) NO. Not at all. I think that Partref is organized very intuitively. And with all of the keyword searches available, the only reason for not finding a part on partref is because the part does not yet have a listing there. I have been using (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)

19 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR