Subject:
|
Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:25:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1268 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.db.inv, Kevin Salm wrote:
> NO. Not at all.
OK, good. That was my main concern.
> Now, having said that, here are some that come to mind:
> 30359 --move to BAR
> 30035 --move to MINIFIG
> 2516 --move to MINIFIG
> 3959 --move to MINIFIG
> 4360 --move to MINIFIG
> 4596 --move to WINGS
> --move all radar dish to own category
OK, good. I agree with most of these, at least sort of. :)
> BUT, don't do these things just 'cause I say so. Who the heck am I to dictate
> to you?? I love partsref and have great respect to all who take the time and
> effort to keep it up-to-date only because they want to without fame or fortune.
I wouldn't change something because just one person says so. Even
(especially) if that one person is me. There are a few people who I bounce
ideas off of before actually doing them.
Organizationally speaking, we all have some ideas that are unique to our own
way of thinking. For example: at my house, we have a 'gizmos' drawer for
odd lego pieces - like bricks with side studs, hinges, plates with clips,
etc. I haven't run into anyone else who thinks ldraw/partsref needs a
'gizmos' category.
> As for Peeron.com image library--I would like to see SOME categorization of
> images but would not favor fragmentation similar to partsref.
> Unnecessary, IMO -- until, perhaps, the time comes that there are lDraw
> renderings and photographic images of 99% of all Lego elements. That is
> unlikely due to the (fast) pace in which The Lego Company produces new
> elements.
Hmm. 99% would be too long to wait, I think. But it might be more
practical to target a certain number of pieces/images per page. 700 is a
lot. Maybe 100-200 would be better? That's still about 500K per page.
> ....my opinions don't count, so I will go back to building now....
Hey! Everyone's opinions count. I'm dead serious about that. There're a
lot of subjective decisions in parts organization, where opinion/intuition
is the major decision influencer. Why would anyone else's opinion matter
more than yours?
But don't let me stop you from building....
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
|
| (...) NO. Not at all. I think that Partref is organized very intuitively. And with all of the keyword searches available, the only reason for not finding a part on partref is because the part does not yet have a listing there. I have been using (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:       
        
     ![Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Thomas Garrison (29-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Jennifer L. Boger (29-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Steve Bliss (29-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)
      ![Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Kevin Dixon (30-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Dan Boger (30-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)
     ![Re: Part naming/organization [was: Re: More inventories on peeron.com!] -Dan Boger (29-Jun-01 to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)](/news/x.gif)
      
       
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|