Subject:
|
Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 04:11:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
656 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.inv, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.db.inv, Kevin Salm wrote:
>
> > At the risk of fragmenting the image library too much like partsref, I would
>
> Sorry to go off-topic here, but do you think partsref is too fragmented?
> I realize I'm reading extra meaning into what you wrote, but this is an
> impression one could get from it...
>
> So I'm asking straight out.
NO. Not at all. I think that Partref is organized very intuitively. And with
all of the keyword searches available, the only reason for not finding a part
on partref is because the part does not yet have a listing there.
I have been using partref for so long that I can find any part I am seeking in
the time it takes for the page to load or faster. Personally, I am comfortable
with partsref the way it is. I would only move a handful of images to
different categories.
Now, having said that, here are some that come to mind:
30359 --move to BAR
30035 --move to MINIFIG
2516 --move to MINIFIG
3959 --move to MINIFIG
4360 --move to MINIFIG
4596 --move to WINGS
--move all radar dish to own category
BUT, don't do these things just 'cause I say so. Who the heck am I to dictate
to you?? I love partsref and have great respect to all who take the time and
effort to keep it up-to-date only because they want to without fame or fortune.
As for Peeron.com image library--I would like to see SOME categorization of
images but would not favor fragmentation similar to partsref.
Unnecessary, IMO -- until, perhaps, the time comes that there are lDraw
renderings and photographic images of 99% of all Lego elements. That is
unlikely due to the (fast) pace in which The Lego Company produces new
elements.
So, don't change partsref. As long as I can view it in frames, I'm happy. And
I suggest only a handful of categories for the Peeron.com image library.
__Kevin Salm__
....my opinions don't count, so I will go back to building now....
.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
|
| (...) OK, good. That was my main concern. (...) OK, good. I agree with most of these, at least sort of. :) (...) I wouldn't change something because just one person says so. Even (especially) if that one person is me. There are a few people who I (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More inventories on peeron.com!
|
| (...) Sorry to go off-topic here, but do you think partsref is too fragmented? I realize I'm reading extra meaning into what you wrote, but this is an impression one could get from it... So I'm asking straight out. Steve Christopher! have you backed (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
