Subject:
|
Re: CW update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jul 2000 16:30:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
836 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Richard Marchetti writes:
> In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Wilson Raska writes:
> > problem I have with the blueofnoon sites are the screen wipes. They're cool
> > and all, but kind of time consuming.
>
> I think its two lines of code that are easily removed, mostly it was to amuse
> me when comparing the two colors of backgrounds.
>
> > So maybe someone could show us how purple looked, and then we could vote on
> > those 3 colors.
>
> Naw, the purple at Fibblesnork is very alarming when used as a background. No
> one would vote for it except perhaps yourself.
Actually, I just looked at the purple for the first time today, and it does
looks really pink. Can I change my vote? : )
The purple ends up looking
> like a hot pink or something -- maybe it would work for a Paradisa site or
> some such.
>
> Myself I would prefer to just use something like parchment instead of bricks
> as a background. I don't mind the screen swipes as much as busy backgrounds!
>
> I have a parchment background I have been saving for a project of my own but I
> could see if it would work for CW. Maybe...
>
> -- Richard
That parchment would probably look cool. I've heard a few people say that my
site (with the black-bricks background) was kind of hard to read, so I'm going
to experiment with having the backgrounds just a solid color.
Wilson
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: CW update
|
| (...) I think its two lines of code that are easily removed, mostly it was to amuse me when comparing the two colors of backgrounds. (...) Naw, the purple at Fibblesnork is very alarming when used as a background. No one would vote for it except (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
