Subject:
|
Re: CW update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle.org.cw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jul 2000 17:30:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
878 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle.org.cw, Chris Maddison writes:
> Alright then, we'll use that'n! Now, do we want black or tan?
>
> Black: http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon2/cw/cw.html
>
> Tan: http://members.aol.com/blueofnoon2/cw/cwtan.html
>
> I like the black better, but the tan looks nice, and fits with the rest...what
> do you guys think? Should we just pick one, or vote, or what?
> -Chris
As it stands, the logo needs to be changed on the beige page. The orange and
brown lettering clashes too much. :) I'd go with the currently in use
Purple... Or we could try Green!! :D
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: CW update
|
| (...) i was just about to post this very thing! on the beige background, a violet or purple lettering would have greater contrast and show up much better. also, violet being a royal color n'all, i think it's castle apropriate. there's already green (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: CW update
|
| Alright then, we'll use that'n! Now, do we want black or tan? Black: (2 URLs) like the black better, but the tan looks nice, and fits with the rest...what do you guys think? Should we just pick one, or vote, or what? -Chris (24 years ago, 20-Jul-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
