Subject:
|
Re: Hello at all Castle Lovers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 02:57:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1663 times
|
| |
| |
Obviously, TLG uses the SCA/Rennie view of the middle ages: everybody who wants to
be can be a noble! Who wants to be a peasant?
"Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!"
Beth Reiten
David Eaton wrote:
> In lugnet.castle, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > Like we have said at NELUG meetings make the peasant King and the Kings
> > soldier and the Soldiers peasants. :) Makes for a much more realistic
> > distribution as long as you don't mind using a pitchfork for a septure and a
> > sword to shovel hay...
>
> :) (assorted snips)
>
>
> > I see the same problem in other themes as well. Lots of Kings/Rulers quite a
> > few Solders but no subjects to rule/oppress.
> >
> > I guess that citizenry is just not exciting enough for kids in TLG's oppinion.
>
> > For castle, I might recommend
> something like a peasant or two in each castle... carrying a hay-cart or
> something, looking after the horses, etc. Would help slowly build up the
> peasant population perhaps, and still would be appealing.
>
> Laterz,
> DaveE
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Hello at all Castle Lovers
|
| (...) wants to (...) One of my favorite (mis)quotes. "You can't just call yourself King because some watery tart lobbed a sword at you! You have to win Crown, too!" James (URL) (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hello at all Castle Lovers
|
| (...) :) (...) Yeah, town & train are most certainly better... although I find that a signifigantly large portion of my people are employed in emergency services... But there is certainly a more healthy amount of everyday Joes and Janes. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|