|
| |
|  
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.045)
|
|
 | | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "travis" wrote... (...) No, I just made a POV file with the objects and the camera for the talented POV artists to play with. They have come up with fantastic settings for colors and lights. And yes, I hope to include some of these in the next L3P. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.044)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Trond Hasse Lie" wrote... (...) Yes, truly amazing! But now have a look at what POV can do... ("with a little help from my fiends" :-) I started 3 1/2 years ago but never finished building the 2556 in LDraw (URL) I grabbed the Ferrari by Kenneth (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hej Jeroen, a BIG thanks to you for this extensive and clear post about how to get 'excelent rendering results' (ERR...) with MegaPov 0.7 but(yes), me is one of those lazy guys... so, how about a comparison between Povray3.5 and MegaPov 0.7 in both (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) To put this into perspective, the Brazil Artist Bundle is $1200, which includes one workstation license and two render node licenses. It is an amazingly good render, though. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 26-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.043)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| (...) Well, you shouldn't actually replace the definitions but place them after line 16 (#declare BUMPNORMAL = normal { bumps 0.01 scale 20 } and before the line saying: # declare 07071 = sqrt(0.5);. Remove the lines #declare AMB = 0.4; and #declare (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.042)
|
|
| | Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hi all, Since the code for photorealistic pictures where released (see (URL) a lot of people have been experimenting with it. Allister McLaren for instance added light (see: (URL) which not only looks better but also removes some radiosity artifacts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.042)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.040)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.040)
|
|
| | Re: problem with dark colors using Lgeo
|
| (...) Hi Willy, There are several ways to do this and (sadly) most/all of them means editing the POV-file: 1) You can increase the power of the lights by changing the "color rgb <1,1,1>" to, say, "color rgb <1.5,1.5,1.5>". You can also change one (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.040)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Well, actually I have (1). But I used the +c switch In POV-Ray so I did most of the rendering at night; my wife doesn't like that the computer is on all day. It's a pretty good option because it goes on where you stopped it. Mind you, you have (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.021)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.021)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) You see, I guess I should somehow now copy/paste this testfile somewhere into a *.pov file made of one of my *.dat files right? Tried it, got errors. I feel stupid, but after seeing all these 'excellent renderings' I say: ME WANNA ME WANNA! (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.020)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.016)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> skrev i meddelandet news:qrdbs67sac0.fsf....uio.no... (...) I dug a bit deeper into the POV manuals, and found it! The '+c' rendering option can be used to continue a rendering that has previously been (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.013)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Wow... now that's what I'd like to see in my animations. But the render times are just impossible. A 15 second clip would take a month rendering! I guess I'll stay with the standard methods and stop-motion for a while. On another note, returning to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.012)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.011)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> skrev i meddelandet news:qrdlm5ccs02.fsf....uio.no... (...) I tend to forget what parameters I'm fiddling with, when the turnaround time goes over one hour. Doing 48 hour renderings would also create a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 1.011)
|
