Subject:
|
Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:52:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
594 times
|
| |
|
|
Hej Jeroen,
a BIG thanks to you for this extensive and clear post
about how to get 'excelent rendering results' (ERR...)
with MegaPov 0.7
but(yes), me is one of those lazy guys...
so, how about a comparison between Povray3.5 and MegaPov 0.7
in both quality and time, with these radiosity settings? I am
more than curious. Give us two pictures to compare!
I know, I know, your pc is still doing my 'oldtimers' picture
all over till after x-mas, but it's december 30 now :))
hasta la pizza,
JF
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| (...) Thanks! (...) Well, I rendered a model by James Mathis (ICE train) with radiosity and camera-blur and Mega-Pov + POV-Ray 3.1 was SEVEN TIMES FASTER than POV-Ray 3.5! I also liked the overal picture rendered by MegaPov better, a bit softer if (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hi all, Since the code for photorealistic pictures where released (see (URL) a lot of people have been experimenting with it. Allister McLaren for instance added light (see: (URL) which not only looks better but also removes some radiosity artifacts (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
