|
 | | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| this is incredible. I will not rest until my rederings look this sweet. -tk "Trond Hasse Lie" <lietro@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H1GKI4.8K7@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 1-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
| 
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| what does this mean? Then I ran it through L3P: (...) Does this have something do with the lighting? -tk "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:H1u4vC.793@lugnet.com... (...) to quality. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| no, its been renamed the autokickasstweak button. seriously I want a step by step tutorial on this image. I like how the shadows are so dull, the seems are invisible, subtle reflections, depth of field, could I go on and on... hell yeah. I'd pay for (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| i do see what you mean. it seems as if my colors are always a little dark using the lgeo librarys, but the detail makes up for it, and photoshop usually gets it to where i can live with it. -tk "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| photoshop? autolevels... autocolors? -tk "Orion Pobursky" <bilthefish@IHATESPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:H2r5CJ.25A@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 21-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.216)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Lars, you have made my week with this posting! I wanted to thank you for pursuing this project, getting help from the big guns. These results are sooooo pretty and very encouraging. (...) Indeed. Other renderers may have an edge in creating (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Hello, this is my first time posting in this group. I just wanted to say that I have been looking around at some of these images and all of them are just fantastic. So real looking! Really really impressive. I would like to make a point of keeping (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Ooohh let's see! (...) I thought I was a big man w/ a 1.0 GHz PC! (...) hhhhmmmm don't know what that means but I look forward to it! (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| I thought I'd throw my contribution into the frey: (URL) (Warning to modem users, 259K) Took about 45 minutes to render on my machine. One thing though, the colors seem to be "washed out". Is there anyway to fix this? -Orion (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hi Jeroen - This looks great! I plugged it into MegaPOV and replaced my color definitions in a POV file with your code. MegaPOV is having a hard time understanding your statements: #if (BUMPS) normal { BUMPNORMAL } #end Any tips? Thanks!! -Tim (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| I've downloaded Megapov and plugged in the extra code but all I get is a black image. For that matter, I get a black image for every file I run that has MegaPov enabled. Am I doing something wrong? Any help would be appreciated. -Orion (22 years ago, 14-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Hi Anders - I'm using this code, with amazing results!! I've tweaked the assumed_gamma and reflection values to get a good LEGO look. One thing I'm still puzzled at is how to get the fuzzy shadow underneath objects? I'm not a POV guru... hope (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.205)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) To put this into perspective, the Brazil Artist Bundle is $1200, which includes one workstation license and two render node licenses. It is an amazingly good render, though. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 26-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) renderings is to work more on the surface/colour definition within POV-Ray. The one which are the default from LGEO or L3P are probably not the optimal ones. With all due respect to the authors, of course! I don't mean to belittle their work, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) I don't think I said that. At least it was not my intension. What I meant to say was that the standard colour/surface definitions in L3P / LGEO need some tweaking to get those results. Fredrik (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) According to the L3P page, it does. However, this might not work with LGEO colors. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.194)
|
