| |
The matrix math will not always invert, although if the matrix
is a pure rotation (with no scaling or shears) the transpose
of the matrix is the inverse.
A better solution would be for the inliner to apply a start
and a stop tag for each inlined file. Perhaps "0 INLINE START "
followed by some pseudo-random string (like mime-enclosures, if you've
ever seen them in-the-raw). Surround the inlined file with
identical tags and have the first line be the commented-out
original. In this way, the inlining operation would be completely
reversable.
-gyug
Sproaticus wrote:
> Is there any way to reverse the inlining to the original file (lossless
> outlining, I guess it would be) using the comment that the inlining function
> writes? Does the matrix math work in this direction?
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
>
> --
> Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
> May the Force be with y'all.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
39 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
