| |
At 09:02 PM 6/2/99 +0000, Sproaticus wrote:
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted)
> > MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of
> > splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way
> > operation.
>
> Is there any way to reverse the inlining to the original file (lossless
> outlining, I guess it would be) using the comment that the inlining function
> writes? Does the matrix math work in this direction?
Sounds like a good feature to have around as well. What is the format
difference between inlining and mpd anyways? They both contain multiple
ldraw models in one file...
(sorry I sound a little clueless...but all I use LDraw/LDAO for is making
models..I do little with pacaging them nice and neat) :)
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted) MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way operation. Steve (26 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
