Subject:
|
Lossless outlining (Was: [ldraw.org] Progress)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Jun 1999 21:02:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities(antispam).com
|
Viewed:
|
37 times
|
| |
| |
Steve Bliss wrote:
> I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted)
> MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of
> splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way
> operation.
Is there any way to reverse the inlining to the original file (lossless
outlining, I guess it would be) using the comment that the inlining function
writes? Does the matrix math work in this direction?
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
May the Force be with y'all.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Progress
|
| (...) I'd recommend going with MPD. LDLite will render a (properly formatted) MPD file, and the MPD format allows downloaders the possibility of splitting the file back into its separate pieces. Inline is a one-way operation. Steve (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|