|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
 | | Re: Moving the License Forward
|
| (...) Whilte you make a good argument, I think you're leaving out something. It's the author's responsibility to maintain an address where LDraw.org can contact them on organizational business. Plus, LDraw.org announces important things like this (...) (20 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: True Type fonts and LDraw files
|
| (...) As far as I know, you can't do that, but I suppose you could do it with a new META statement. (...) I think there might be some LDRAW programs out there with a notion of a floor or background image. Those are 2D objects that may or may not (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Anyone considered Java?
|
| (...) Java3D won't necessarily be in the picture; the discussion you linked to has addressed the need for flexibility in this issue. The plan here is two-fold: make it cross-platform and make it an extensible framework. It's not so much about (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Java 3D app ready for Mac LDraw?
|
| Hey everybody, At BricksWest last weekend, Wayne Gramlich told me about this site: (URL) you are heavily into Java, Wayne figures that it would take no more than a week of code to have a Macintosh LDraw modeller written on top of this. Do we have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: What's up with www.ldraw.org?
|
| (...) AHAHHAHA!!! BRICKSHELF MODERATORS DELETE THEM!!!! AHAHHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! I have to leave right now and will be back by 10PM CST online. I will set tp the files somewhere that WILL NOT delete them. The earliest the files will be up is tomorrow (...) (22 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) [snip] (...) I read the exact same clause and come to exactly the opposite conclusion. My reasoning is that because linking is something you do to code, not LDraw parts; the clause has no bearing to LDraw parts. Is my interpretation right, or (...) (20 years ago, 12-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Black seems wrong in ldconfig.ldr
|
| (...) Given that ldconfig.ldr is part of the LDraw parts library, I was referring to the color reference on the LDraw.org site (noted in another message). However, it might make sense to use the colors above, since they came directly from Lego, and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>: (...) I wasn't brainstorming. I was expressing my opinion. I was expressing it as strongly as I thought was appropriate given how strongly I felt about it. I am not only concerned with myself about (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Organizing the LDraw CD-ROM
|
| (...) of (...) I haven't been following this thread to closely, but uh, are you considering machines that are not running Windows. LdGLite 0.4 is due to be released real soon and should run pretty well on Linux and the Mac in addition to Windows. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Inline POV code in official parts?
|
| (...) The LDraw POV project ((URL) was created with the intention of someday becoming the de-facto, if not the actual, official LDraw compatible POV repository. I'll admit that it has languished for sometime (it's been almost 4 years sine I (...) (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Thoughts on File Format for LDraw Animation
|
| (...) I really should write a part 2.... Basically, it involves converting the model to povray (or whatever, blender even). If the conversion process retains the parent-child hierarchy, then you don't have to go into the converted code and 1) add (...) (19 years ago, 26-Oct-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
|
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) In this case, I say use the number stamped on the part. (...) Did we decide to move away from the xxxxPxx format? This sounds like a good reason to rethink that decision. Not that I expect this particular element to ever resurface in a (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.151)
|
