|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
 | | Re: LCD - LEGO Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) Is it restricted in applicability to just LDraw parts? (that is, if there were a competing parts format, could the idea be applicable? Could the database (perhaps with coordinate transformation) itself? If it's not restricted (and I think it's (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Actually this brings up a different issue. I haven't put alot of thought into it yet, but I think it would be useful to add information in the part files that would allow a program to differentiate between geometry that represents 'outside' (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I'll have a better answer for this when I port my Java implementation to Perl. But yah, I guess "comprehensive" and "generic" don't quite mix well. I want comprehensive, in that this library could be used for many different methods of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: LDMC News Digest (To Get The Ball Rolling)
|
| Matt, thanks for posting that. I was too busy to get anything out earlier. In addition, I just wanted to add the following. Don has gotten ldglite to compile on Mac OS X and I tested it and it works. The steps to compile it are in Matt's email (the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | [parts tracker] search by AUTHOR
|
| Steve, I've got a request for the parts tracker ("(URL) It would help me if I could search the list by Author, to see the status of all the parts that I've posted, instead of having to wade through the entire list of parts (and hope that I've (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - What to include
|
| Hi all, For the RNDR 101 and CONV 101 should I include some basic POV-Ray editing (colours, background, turning lights in to shadowless lights) or is that more a RNDR201 thing? And can we have a lugnet.cad.tutorial group? or is that a bit too much? (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Ok. Up until now I've been under the impression we were trying to come up with a pure interface definition, independent of any particular language, platform, or implementation. When I asked if they weren't all abstract, I was envisioning (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Fonts and CSS
|
| Tim, The site looks alot better with Internet Explorer and Mac OS 9. Netscape 4.x is still too small. But I think Netscape is dead enough that you don't need to worry about it. I don't even bother with Netscape 6. In Mac OS X it looked fine with (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I can definately see the benefits of a standard library interface. Even an implementation might have a lot of uses. I just think that you will get the best design for the interface, if you forget about how you or anyone implemented it in the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Yes, What you're describing does sound like BFC to me. As someone else (travis I think?) said, BFC is a useful optimiziation for reducing the number of surfaces that need to be drawn. But it's not the same thing I was talking about. BFC (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: LCD - LDraw Connection Database - Proposal
|
| (...) I think there is some examples in the proposal too. (...) Yes, I understand you! It would be a programming language based on and according to the LCD. It would be LMPL - LDraw Model Programming Language. How about that? :) But, I think we need (...) (23 years ago, 6-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) A couple of different approaches to this have been discussed before. I think the most generic solution was to implement a 0 DETAIL <level> meta-command, that would identify the detail-level of the following lines. A 0 detail level indicates (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.887)
|
