To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6875
6874  |  6876
Subject: 
Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 10 Feb 2002 06:41:20 GMT
Viewed: 
1938 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes:
> This is interesting. I wonder what we can do as far as making it both
> comprehensive and generic enough to be easily used by all those
> languages. (I haven't fully read your second message but I"ll probably
> have more comments there.)

I'll have a better answer for this when I port my Java implementation to
Perl.  But yah, I guess "comprehensive" and "generic" don't quite mix well.

I want comprehensive, in that this library could be used for many different
methods of manipulating a datfile.

I want generic, in that it could be implemented and used in different
languages, and on many different platforms and architectures.

> I understand your dislike for J3d, and we don't need to go through that
> again,

Please forgive me.  I was just poking some fun at myself as well as J3D, but
it looks like I came across as rude.  I meant no offense.  :-,

> Also in your evaluation J3D etc... Did you happen to try GL4Java?

No, I skipped that, I don't even know if I have an OpenGL library on this
machine.  I was looking more at the DirectX aspect...

Why do you ask?

Cheers,
- jsproat



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
 
(...) I can definately see the benefits of a standard library interface. Even an implementation might have a lot of uses. I just think that you will get the best design for the interface, if you forget about how you or anyone implemented it in the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
 
(...) > (Maybe not too much, let's keep it lean and mean.) At the least, I > think we should make the object model workable in C++, Java, Perl and > Python. (...) This is interesting. I wonder what we can do as far as making it both comprehensive (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

30 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR