Subject:
|
Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:15:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
594 times
|
| |
|
|
> This class hierarchy is actually the class library I whipped up over the
> past week. About 95% of what I posted here has working code, but I didn't
> want to push any of that if there's no consensus on the higher-level design...
OK. This is sounding very yummy. When can we start using the frameworks.
> I think that traffic in Salt Lake City is pretty much congested for the next
> two or three weeks. Everything else is pure conjecture. ;-)
Nonsense. I got to work and home just fine today, and I even found parking
right across from where they had the opening ceremonies. :-)
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I'm hoping within a couple of month or so (beta with a month or so), but it really depends on how this project goes, and the schedules of anyone who wants to contribute. (...) That shattering sound you just heard was my jaw hitting the floor. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) The base class is abstract, the ones not marked "abstract" aren't. This class hierarchy is actually the class library I whipped up over the past week. About 95% of what I posted here has working code, but I didn't want to push any of that if (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
