|
 | | Re: numbers for "Castle" minifig torso patterns?...
|
| (...) I see three reasons why this argument may be flawed, but I think we are confusing the meaning of subpart. 1) The Pxx number are all two digits, so 973p4.dat should never exist. 2) The same pattern on a part varient would be demand a suffix for (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
| Michael Heinich <mheinich@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:G6LG5t.LM5@lugnet.com... (...) There usually aren't enough models to have any real competition in the categories. I really like a lot of the models this month, and the cathedral *is* the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Planned downtime January 23rd 2001
|
| Due to a rebuilding of the power systems at Risø National Laboratory, www.ldraw.org (and hugin.ldraw.org) will be off-line January 23rd 2001 from 16:00 to 19:00 UTC. Play well, Jacob -- "The current state of knowledge can be summarised thus: In the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| (...) In other words, the contributors grant ldraw.org the rights to do whatever they want with the parts. This should be in the parts submission page, along with a button "I have read and accept the terms of the agreement". It has nothing to do (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
| New to this forum, this is my first chance to vote for MOTM. It's too bad you don't have catagories because there are a couple of strong models here. Both the tractor and train are excellent models as well as the Patrol set of space ships. But the (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | LDraw.org Meeting in New York City, Sun Feb 11
|
| In case you are interested, there is a semi-formal LDraw.org meeting this Sunday in New York City. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the formation of the LDraw.org organization, collaborative software efforts among contributors, future (...) (24 years ago, 8-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.loc.us.ny.ny, lugnet.loc.us.nj, lugnet.loc.us.ct, lugnet.loc.us.pa) !
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| "Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) part in (...) The (...) relied (...) wrote (...) not (...) different. (...) LDraw (...) directly. (...) Thanks for the correction and lists. John Van (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: Keywords Question
|
| (...) Yes there is. If the news-search wasn't temporarily deactivated, I'd point you to it. Here's a cooked version of the discussion: ===...=== FAQ for CATEGORY and KEYWORDS meta-statements ===...=== Q: What are '0 CATEGORY' and '0 KEYWORDS'? A: (...) (24 years ago, 13-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
| Yeah - I wasn't sure what to submit either. The long shot shows the overall construction the best (when you bring up the enlarged picture), but its certainly not very impressive for the thumbnail. Any suggestions? By the way, if you have ideas on (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: January LDraw MOTM Competition
|
| Here is a copy of the tutorial I'm going to submit on camera angles: Free-Form Camera Positioning with MLCAD, L3P, and POV-RAY One of the hardest issues to grasp when starting out with MLCAD, L3P, and POV-RAY is figuring out how to position the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| (...) That's information you have and we didn't... so I defer, gladly. However I do want to repeat this: (...) Well, I know what *I* prefer anyway. Open source is better than closed source, LDraw format, warts and all, is at least publicly (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| | Author key in ldraw.ini\[LDraw]
|
| I have added Author key in the [LDraw] section of ldraw.ini, just because I was tired of filling it in every time I run LDA2001. The value of the ident will be suggested as a default author next time you start an application reading it. Anyone who (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jul-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.931)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| (...) Rather than harm, I think we owe you thanks for having dug in a bit to get another perspective! Thanks! (...) I disagree here, as we have seen in some recent instances of differing versions of parts, we can argue that LDraw parts are artistic (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: Special tools used to build/design parts?
|
| (...) I'd especially like to hear from Franklin "Mr. Prolific" Cain. Are you using some tool unknown to the rest of us, Franklin? (...) There's LDraw Add-On, which includes a text editor with some LDraw-related editing tools. And LDScript (with (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G55oJJ.M9@lugnet.com... (...) cost (...) is (...) The "user" base may be small, but the "viewer" base is much larger. How many times have you seen an LDraw'n model and thought, "I have got to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
|
| | Re: License - again
|
| (...) When TLG offered me a job, my first task would be to work in that project so I know what this is all about. I signed an NDA when I was in Billund and I can't talk about it but I think I can say that unless they changed their plans, they won't (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.930)
|
