CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 2201 – 2220 of about 7000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Draft v.3
(...) Thanks for catching this, Ross. -Tim (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: Must everything be php?
(...) I realize that. But why do you even want to convert it? It seems like the php content management system you're using must be unbearably tedious. Can't you just put it somewhere and submit an article that points to it? Meanwhile why highlight (...) (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) All, I hope you don't mind if I chime in on the discussion. I just caught up on the thread, and there are a lot of very good things being tossed around. Personally, I tend to like the idea of Larry's to exclude any mention of LEGO employee (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: Adding part updates (and clone parts)
(...) Fortunately, I had already made some small steps in that direction prior to Matthew's debut! (And my clone-collaborator wasn't involved in the birth at all, so his efforts have proceeded unabated.) (...) Oh, that... The well-designed site (as (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: [request] filter for PT queue
(...) I guess you missed (URL) I have added the functionality Franklin was asking for. Strange how your reply message only appeared ~27 minutes before this response, even though it has a 14Feb date! Chris (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - additional search paths
(...) Something similar (but probably not identical to) the above would have my vote (I'll explain below). I would clarify that if ldraw.ini can't be found in the user's home directory (aka the user profile directory), then the Windows directory (...) (21 years ago, 17-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I concur. :) I haven't been following this thread at all up until now, but Jake's post caught my eye. And I agree with what he said - only I want to go a little further. Couldn't anybody that even has association with TLC possibly have a (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I do apologise if I misinterpreted your words, but I would suggest that my interpretation is an extremely reasonable one given the word choices you used. (...) I would think not, but I look to the steering committee to do a lot more than make (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - additional search paths
(...) In DOS/Windows the problem with environment space is (I believe) more a problem of limited total environment space. I don't think there's additional limitations on individual variables. So using multiple environment variables might conceivably (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) That (both the itlug and Dan's solutions) is definitely a nice and easy solution. The problem here is that Tim would like to keep his job at LEGO and have a go at being on the LDraw.org steering committee. Since I don't know what Tim's (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I don't see this discussion as about Tim at all, except as a test case. As I've said before, he's a handy metric. Any rule that excludes him (based on his current employment situation) is wrong, and worse, it is in my view bad for the (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - additional search paths
Several users have asked for an option to L3P for specifying additional search paths for parts. LDView already has implemented "Extra Search Dirs" to search after the usual ones. I think it would be of common interest and for the benefit of the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) While I agree that someone in that situation might have such a conflict of interest, then again,they might not. It's pretty far fetched to see how someone in Tim's position could possibly have any conflict of interest (except in a good way for (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) ... (...) So let's separate the issues. I think we all agree that a LEGO employee should not be in the SC (if only for the appearance of impropriety). If you want to make a special case for Tim, or make a more generic way of allowing (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) He's high enough up (and his job description is focused in such a critical direction) that I think almost everyone would agree that there was a conflict of interest in his case. LEGO is his career now, after all. (...) The problem with special (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
(...) Not sensing any disagreement here - so if no one's spoken up by the end of the weekend, I'm going to add these clauses to the drafts and call for ratification. -Tim (21 years ago, 7-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) No, I do not think we all agree that. (...) Yes, someone does so disagree. In fact I'd go farther, I think most of us do disagree, at least for the case of people that have little or no practical influence within LEGO (people who work in (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
Thanks to everyone who has been participating in the bylaws discussion. These are important issues, and in my view the opinions put forth have been by and large well thought out and productive. I think we've covered the lion's share of the possible (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I object, for the record. I think the point isn't if someone can influence TLC policy, but if they can influence LDraw's policy. In my optinion, if you get a paycheck from LEGO, you might have a conflict of interest. (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
(...) What about MegaBloks, or any other company that may have an interest? Why pointing the finger on TLC only? Why not have a more general clause about conflict of interest? -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

More: Next Page >>