|
 | | lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| (...) (An aside -- lugnet.trains.org might become lugnet.trains.clubs -- see the discussion in lugnet.trains for more info.) (...) OK, I've got it! Figured this out after resetting my brain last night. Forget everything so far (except the local (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
| (...) There isn't a very formal organization right now, so this shift is not a huge step and should happen as soon as possible. (...) You mean a more formal support ? I think that any questions posted to the lugnet.cad.* groups is very well answered (...) (24 years ago, 16-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: txt2dat - Create LDraw files from text
|
| (...) Version 0.1.4 now available at the same page. Changes in v0.1.4 are: Use “LDraw inverse colour” for lines. Fixed non-ansi definition of add_char() and add_string(). Implemented better algorithm for choosing the number of segments in splines. (...) (19 years ago, 29-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Unusual View matrices in LDRAW.INI
|
| Hey, does anybody out there know the origin of the "Oblique", "UpsideDown", and "Natural" viewing matrices in LDRAW.INI. I'm not sure whether these came from LDAO, LDLITE, or perhaps even LDRAW? Wherever they came from, they don't seem to be pure (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw announcements/updates
|
| (...) Todd, it was a joke. We just moved in here, right? (...) That's an interesting idea. Can people subscribe via e-mail without visiting the web-pages (even if it means they can't post?) (...) But that's because most robotics-heads are subscribed (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) Another benefit of a Java version is that it's *much* easier to write networkable apps with Java than with C / C++. Parts updates can be automagically downloaded and installed from a "parts server"; alternatively, individual parts could be (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) It's surprisingly easy. Java actually doesn't suck! :) You just allocate a buffer, designate it as being a graphics buffer, and call functions to do graphics primitives. Here's an example -- not probably a great example because it's 3 years (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) It's probably even easier now, with the new 2D graphics API finished (1), and a 3D API in the works. I don't claim to know how these work (or even if they're useful for anything :-) but I've seen the 2D API favorably compared to the (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) Yes, definitely if as an app would you have all the files locally. I was talking about an applet that would not. You don't want to have to download the entire zip file every time because it would be fairly large. Having individually compressed (...) (26 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| [removed lugnet.cad from Newsgroups line] (...) I think the speed comparison depends on whether you use mod_perl or CGI+Perl or a specialized Perl HTTP daemon. Of course, if the code running on the server is Java, a Servlet is almost certainly the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) There is a servlet program plugin for Apache on Linux or NT at (URL) We're using the IIS version of it on NT. It is nice and speedy for java servlets. I assume the lugnet server is Linux. (...) Hmm... how long does it take ldlite to render an (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| That would probably cut out the servlet possibility, then. There isn't a very good implementation of java for FreeBSD (no JIT), and I'm not sure about a Java Servlet implementation, either. (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| (...) You can use FastCGI ((URL) to have one process (or a fixed group of processes) serving CGI requests so you don't have the overhead of restarting the process (interpreter or otherwise) for each request. I used it for the Lego set database I (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
|
| | Re: Java LDraw/LDLite
|
| Please before starting take a look at the java3D api, I know java 2 is not yet supported directly by most browsers but its just a question of time and then you have all the 3D done for you AND you get the benefice of 3D accelerations. Greg Williams (...) (26 years ago, 28-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.153)
|
