Subject:
|
Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 04:31:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
852 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I guess I can see that. I still think the modified FORCE described above
> could be useful, though.
I think it could, in models and unofficial stuff. But I don't think it
would be useful in the official parts library.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
| (...) I hadn't thought about NOCLIP. (...) I think that FORCE would be more useful if it overrode NOCERTIFY, but not NOCLIP. When you say NOCERTIFY, you're saying you don't know how the file should be culled. When you say NOCLIP, you're saying you (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
