Subject:
|
Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:05:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
871 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> Do we really need to put the revision number next to every line? I find
> that astheically annoying. The way we do it in Nuke land is put a heavy
> black line in the margin next to all the lines that changed from the last
> revision.
I never imagined those numbers would be a permanent part of the document.
I thought they'd go away once we accepted the BFC standard. But that never
actually happened, so the document was never finalized, so the numbers
never went away.
When you are editing text by hand, it's easier to just tag the lines you
are changing, rather than clearing all the old marks, then making changes.
Plus, the numbers help indicate how long a particular section has been
untouched. That can indicate stability of that part of the proposal.
I do agree they are asthetically annoying. But I didn't want to spend any
column width on putting more whitespace between the numbers and the text.
So, bottom line, yeah, I'd rather keep the numbers, at least for a little
while longer.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
| (...) Don't forget, as per this post ((URL) I'm resetting all the numbers in the current document to 1 prior to making my new changes. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
| (...) Do we really need to put the revision number next to every line? I find that astheically annoying. The way we do it in Nuke land is put a heavy black line in the margin next to all the lines that changed from the last revision. -Orion (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|