Subject:
|
Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 08:26:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
633 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> Yes, that's the latest document that can claim to be a spec. I checked the
> Parts Tracker FAQ, but it just pointed me to
> http://www.geocities.com/partsref/bfc/
> which just has links, primarily to the document Lars found.
>
> If anyone wants to rewrite the proposal document to something that's more
> legible, that would be great.
>
> Steve
Steve -
Do you want to stick this on the site, or do you want me to? Either way is
fine with me.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Latest BFC Spec?
|
| (...) Yes, that's the latest document that can claim to be a spec. I checked the Parts Tracker FAQ, but it just pointed me to (URL) just has links, primarily to the document Lars found. If anyone wants to rewrite the proposal document to something (...) (22 years ago, 12-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
