To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8549
8548  |  8550
Subject: 
Re: Latest BFC Spec?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 01:20:53 GMT
Viewed: 
2856 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> > Please let me know if you'd like me to incorporate my suggested changes in
> > and post the result for discussion.
> 
> That would be great.  If you could preserve the format of the document (and
> change the rev to 11), I'd appreciate it.
> 
> If anyone has a suggestion for a better way to track changes to the
> document, I'm open.  My main requirement is that no proprietary file
> formats (MS Word document, PDF) are allowed.

OK, I'll start working on it.  It might take a few days.  Before I start,
though I'd like to suggest resetting all line-version tags in the current
version to 1, and then making my new changes as version 2.  Given how long
it's been since the file was changed, I don't think there is any advantage
to maintaining the version of each line.

--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)

p.s.  I see that Steve is trying to single-handedly boost the cad.dev
traffic statistics. :-)



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Latest BFC Spec?
 
(...) I think that's all right. (...) Hey, it looked like so much fun ... I don't think you were around for the old days. I might not have replied to every message in .cad, but it was close to that. Steve (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Latest BFC Spec?
 
(...) Do we really need to put the revision number next to every line? I find that astheically annoying. The way we do it in Nuke land is put a heavy black line in the margin next to all the lines that changed from the last revision. -Orion (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Latest BFC Spec?
 
(...) Absolutely. :) The spec was never ratified or 'officially' accepted as a standard. Parts of it are have definitely evolved as the defacto standard, but that's not the same as having a good, documented standard to follow. I think the spec can (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

38 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR