Subject:
|
Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 10:05:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
728 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee writes:
> Patience please - it's the holiday season and some of us have families to
> consider.
I'll have patience.
These dull and rainy holidays in the Netherlands are ideal to do some
part authoring ;-)
Yes I have families to consider, too. My grandparents celebrated their
84th and 85th birthdays. And I could borrow some old parts my uncles
used to play with in the sixties.
> Your suggestion of box3-2.dat is insufficiently specific as it does not
> indicate the relationship between the 3 drawn faces, nor that between the
> missing lines.
> If the two missing lines are parallel, then I prefer box3u2p.dat as that would
> follow the convention.
It is a box with three faces (bottom, front and back, just as box3#8p) with
two lines missing (top left front to back, and top right front to back)
All lines around the faces are present.
I have an image at
http://home.hetnet.nl/~niels-karsdorp/ldraw/partsprimitive.htm
> And, could you please refrain from referring to "box3#8.dat" - this does not
> exist and I think mentioning it without the p is compounding the confusion -
> the primitive we've been discussing is "box3#8p.dat".
Sorry, yes i ment box3#8p.dat (new box3u8p.dat)
Niels
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
