CAD Development : 8103


CAD / Development / 8103	8102 \| 8104

Subject:	Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2002 12:53:53 GMT
Viewed:	591 times

In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes: > We should consider renaming this to get around this limitation. > > More programs and applets may start tring to access the files > through URLS in the future. Who knows. > > -Kyle I'll think about box3-8 or something (box with 3 sides, missing 8 lines) I need a similar primitive with all edges along the three sides. That could be named box3-2 (box with 3 sides, missing 2 lines) Niels

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
(...) Manfred Moolhuysen developed this naming convention and posted (probably to the old lcad list) in May 1998, but I cannot locate a copy right now. IIRC the # was intended to indicate that the missing edges were not adjacent (which is what the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
We should consider renaming this to get around this limitation. More programs and applets may start tring to access the files through URLS in the future. Who knows. -Kyle (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search