Subject:
|
Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:05:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
437 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Niels Karsdorp writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Kyle McDonald writes:
> > We should consider renaming this to get around this limitation.
> >
> > More programs and applets may start tring to access the files
> > through URLS in the future. Who knows.
> >
> > -Kyle
>
> I'll think about box3-8 or something
> (box with 3 sides, missing 8 lines)
>
> I need a similar primitive with all edges along the three sides.
> That could be named box3-2 (box with 3 sides, missing 2 lines)
>
> Niels
Manfred Moolhuysen developed this naming convention and posted (probably to
the old lcad list) in May 1998, but I cannot locate a copy right now. IIRC
the # was intended to indicate that the missing edges were not adjacent
(which is what the '-' means in other primitives) but in a parallel set. I'm
happy to use another (more html acceptable) character, but not '-'. I prefer
the underscore '_' character. We can replace box3#8 with a moved to file in
the interim.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
