To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8116
8115  |  8117
Subject: 
Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 02:30:01 GMT
Viewed: 
792 times
  
Chris,

I'm alright with the 'u' convention.  It'd be wicked cool if someone sat
down and figured out all the possible box configurations (there can't be
*that* many of them), so we could have a clearer idea of what we're
trying to describe.

Then again, maybe that was done back in 1998 and I've totally wiped it
from my mind.

Steve

In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:

In lugnet.cad.dev, Niels Karsdorp writes:
Still no answer on the box primitive naming conventions.

For my spoked wheels I needed a new primitive,
like the box3#8.dat but with all adjecent edges.
I named it box3-2.dat (Box, 3 faces drawn, 2
edges left out), but how should I name it so I
can upload this new primitive to the parts tracker?

Niels

Patience please - it's the holiday season and some of us have families to
consider.

I was hoping to get more replies to http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=8111
where I explained the naming convention as currently implemented. So, if no-one
is bothered, I'll change box3#8p.dat to box3u8p.dat. There's already a BFC'd
version on the PT, but it cannot be reviewed due to the # in the filename
generating a bad URL to the ptdetail page generator.

Your suggestion of box3-2.dat is insufficiently specific as it does not
indicate the relationship between the 3 drawn faces, nor that between the
missing lines.
If the two missing lines are parallel, then I prefer box3u2p.dat as that would
follow the convention.

And, could you please refrain from referring to "box3#8.dat" - this does not
exist and I think mentioning it without the p is compounding the confusion -
the primitive we've been discussing is "box3#8p.dat".

Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
 
(...) Patience please - it's the holiday season and some of us have families to consider. I was hoping to get more replies to (URL) I explained the naming convention as currently implemented. So, if no-one is bothered, I'll change box3#8p.dat to (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR