Subject:
|
Re: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:09:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
371 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Niels Karsdorp writes:
> While updating my parts I noticed that many subparts and
> primitives are not BFC certified. Is someone working on
> making the primitives BFC compliant or shall I update the
> primitives I use, too? (box3#8.dat has even one face wrong
> side up, but is easy to correct and make BFC compliant).
All primitives really should be BFC'ed first...
Strictly speaking you cannot certify a part unless all references
are certified, but see http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=7997
/Lars
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | BFC parts with BFC-less primitives
|
| Hello, I have just found out all about BFC and how to make parts BFC compliant (yes, I know, I should have found that out earlier ;-). Most of the parts I submitted to the parts tracker are not reviewed, yet (not complainig about that), so I thought (...) (22 years ago, 19-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
