CAD Development : 8112


CAD / Development / 8112	8111 \| 8113

Subject:	Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev
Date:	Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:53:59 GMT
Viewed:	745 times

In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee writes: > If we stick with special characters > ! @ # $ % ^ & ( ) - _ { } : ' > OK for MS-DOS Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y > Easy for UNIX N Y Y N Y Y N N N Y Y N N Y N > OK for URL . Y N . Y Y . . . Y Y . . Y . > > Of these, I think : is probably the best. : is not ok for MS-DOS! (It is used to after the drive name, like C: > But why not box3u8p.dat ? Sound good to me Niels

Message has 1 Reply:

		New primitive box3-2.dat (was Re: What's up with box3#8.dat?)
Still no answer on the box primitive naming conventions. For my spoked wheels I needed a new primitive, like the box3#8.dat but with all adjecent edges. I named it box3-2.dat (Box, 3 faces drawn, 2 edges left out), but how should I name it so I can (...) (22 years ago, 29-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
(...) There already is a 'p' suffix meaning parallel - the primitive is actually named box3#8p.dat. I found the original text from Manfred (dated 16Oct1998) copied here with minor spelling corrections - note that Manfred uses the word 'rib' for (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

27 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search