Subject:
|
Re: More parts feedback
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:09:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
944 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:26:05 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner
<fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> I don't think you understood what part we were talking about. These are
> the three parts we do _not_ want to group together:
>
> 2637.DAT Technic Link 16L
> 3711.DAT Technic Link Chain
> 3873.DAT Technic Link Tread
2637 should be renamed to something like
2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Links
2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with Holes
2637.DAT Technic Axle 16 with End Connectors
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) This sounds like a very good idea. It will also make it easier to include the Technic Linkage part which comes with the Y-wing. (8 of them in every Y-wing, don't know just how long they are.) Here's one more suggestion as to the title: (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I agree with that. It would be a lot more sensible. And I like the original names for the Link Chain/Tread pieces. So, what do we like? with End Links / Holes / End Connectors? Or is there a nomenclature even more apt out there? -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: More parts feedback
|
| (...) I don't think you understood what part we were talking about. These are the three parts we do _not_ want to group together: 2637.DAT Technic Link 16L 3711.DAT Technic Link Chain 3873.DAT Technic Link Tread Don't worry, I originally thought the (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
